← Insights
Brief No. 5

The money that never comes: why Medicaid providers wait months to get paid for work already done

For thousands of home care agencies, behavioral health providers, and community-based organizations across the country, delivering Medicaid-funded services is only half the job. The other half is getting paid for it — and that half can take weeks, months, or in some cases, never happen at all.

On paper, Medicaid is straightforward: a provider delivers an authorized service, submits a claim, and receives reimbursement. In practice, the system is anything but. Agencies can carry large balances in accounts receivable, tied up not because the work wasn't done, but because of how the claims pipeline is built.

A system with too many gatekeepers

Unlike a typical commercial transaction, a Medicaid claim usually passes through several layers before payment is released: the state Medicaid agency, a managed care organization (MCO) acting as intermediary, a clearinghouse processing the electronic submission, and sometimes a separate fiscal intermediary handling payroll-based services like personal care or home health aides. Each layer has its own validation rules, timelines, and error thresholds.

A single mismatch — a service code that doesn't align with an authorization, a missing modifier, an electronic visit verification (EVV) record that doesn't perfectly match the billed timeframe — can send a claim back for correction. Multiply that across hundreds of claims a week, and agencies end up running a full-time reconciliation operation just to keep cash moving.

Timely filing rules work against providers

Most states and MCOs impose strict timely filing windows, often 90 to 365 days depending on the payer. That sounds generous until a claim is denied for a technicality, corrected, and resubmitted — sometimes more than once. Each cycle eats into the filing window, and if an agency's administrative capacity is thin, claims can age out entirely, converting real, delivered care into a permanent write-off.

Cash flow, not profitability, is the first casualty

The uncomfortable truth is that most Medicaid providers aren't losing money on the cost of service delivery itself — they're losing liquidity while waiting to be paid for services already rendered. Payroll for direct care staff goes out biweekly regardless of whether reimbursement has arrived. That mismatch forces agencies to rely on lines of credit, factoring arrangements, or owner capital just to bridge the gap, adding financing costs on top of an already thin margin.

Smaller and mid-sized agencies feel this most acutely. Without a dedicated revenue cycle management team, or the software to track claims status in real time, uncollected receivables can quietly build for months before anyone realizes how much money is actually stuck in the system.

What providers can do

The agencies that manage this best tend to treat claims management as a core operational function, not an afterthought. That means daily (not monthly) claims aging reviews, dedicated staff or software tracking denials by root cause, and proactive communication with MCOs before small errors become aged, unrecoverable receivables. It also means understanding each payer's specific rules well enough to get claims right the first time, since resubmission is always slower and riskier than a clean initial filing.

At Martin & Young, this is the work we do every day. Run by an operator with over ten years of operating experience in US Medicaid home care back office — more than six of them on EVV reconciliation — our team helps agencies turn aging receivables into predictable cash flow, catching errors before they become denials and recovering revenue that's already been earned. If uncollected claims are quietly draining your organization, it's worth finding out exactly how much, and what it would take to get it back.

Martin & Young reviews 30 days of an agency's EVV exception data and returns a written assessment of what's recoverable — free, whether or not we work together. Request the assessment.